you're reading...
abortion, war on women

An OB/GYN evaluates the feticide case in Indiana

A 33-year-old woman in Indiana, Purvi Patel, presented to an emergency room with vaginal bleeding and when it was obvious that she had very recently delivered a baby the doctors on call notified the authorities. The body of her 28 week gestation infant was recovered. The pathologist believed the baby had taken a breath so Ms. Patel was with charged with neglect of a dependent. Sometime later the police realized she had purchased two “prescription” medications online for abortion and feticide charges were added. As an OB/GYN I see this case very differently than the prosecutor in St. Joseph’s county. Here’s why.

Ms. Patel is charged with neglect because she did not call an ambulance or seek medical care “immediately” when she delivered prematurely, resulting in the death of the newborn. While we may never know what was going through Ms.Patel’s mind as she delivered alone and unassisted, when this happened to me I was paralyzed by fear and shock and I am an OB/GYN. While the circumstances were slightly different for my delivery (I was also very premature, but my baby was wanted) the only thing I could do was scream and cry. I’m not sure I could have composed myself enough to get to a phone for some time so how would a woman who likely thought she was nowhere near the third trimester with no medical background be expected to act? Calm and collected? She may have been weak from blood loss, confused, or even passed out after she delivered. Never mind the fear that she might have felt due to Indiana’s history of persecuting women in similar desperate circumstances. Keep in mind this is a state that prosecuted Bei Bei Shua for feticide when her fetus died as the result of her suicide attempt and a state that jailed a pregnant woman for two days when she sought care for falling down the stairs and had confided to her nurse that she was ambivalent about her pregnancy.

What if Ms. Patel had called an ambulance? There is no way to know if an extremely premature baby who delivered at home unaided could even have been resuscitated by paramedics. Extremely premature babies typically require immediate neonatal intensive care, so the baby may have died in the time it took Ms. Patel to recover enough from the delivery to having a look. As the pathologist commented that most of the blood had been drained as the cord had not been clamped the baby likely died almost immediately after delivery and there would have been no chance of resuscitation outside of a hospital.

It is then clear why the prosecutor added feticide. The jury might very well believe that Ms. Patel wasn’t guilty of neglect, that perhaps she wanted to call for help but was simply too scared, in shock, or bleeding too much. The jury might also not believe the pathologist, raising reasonable doubt that the baby was born alive. The jury might also believe that an unassisted home birth is traumatic and the very fragile umbilical cord of an extremely premature baby could easily snap at delivery and unless a skilled team had been on the scene at that time there was no hope of survival. So, if a conviction is to be secured a second charge must be added. Hence feticide from the drugs bought online.

However, it is very likely Ms. Patel never even took an abortifacient. Many (if not most) online pharmacies selling “abortion” drugs are profiting from counterfeit medication, sugar pills, expired product, or even an entirely different drug altogether. Womenonwaves.org has an incredibly long list of pharmacies that sell bad abortion medications. A desperate market is a profitable one. To whom exactly would a pregnant woman complain when she doesn’t complete what the state has deemed an illegal abortion? It is most likely (far beyond a reasonable doubt) that Ms. Patel took anything but an abortifacient. Testing other drugs from the same online pharmacy won’t reveal anything. Every pill might contain something different. That’s what happens without regulation.

So if Ms.Patel didn’t take an abortifacient why did she deliver prematurely? We don’t what she really took or the time frame from ingesting this medication until her delivery, but we do know that it appears she had the single biggest risk factor for a premature delivery: no prenatal care. It is far more likely that she delivered early because of her lack of prenatal care than ingesting anything she bought online.

The feticide charges have ramifications far beyond this case. What is stopping a prosecutor from charging a woman with feticide if she smokes during pregnancy and has a stillborn? Smoking is likely far more fetotoxic that whatever online pharmacies are selling to desperate women. What about obesity, another major risk factor for stillbirth? If feticide laws are about protecting fetal life doesn’t all fetal life matter? The prosecutor in the Bei Bei Shua case tried to allay concerns that the state of Indiana wants to “monitor pregnancies”and while I am in no way suggesting that maternal behavior in pregnancy be criminalized to say that fetal life only matters when abortion is involved is a very challenging construct. It is clear these feticide laws exist not to save babies but to force birth and punish women.

When a woman desperately doesn’t want to be pregnant and the state has limited her options she will resort to almost anything. Ms. Patel’s case is evidence of that. Feticide laws will not stop a woman from sticking a sharp object blindly into her vagina in the hopes that she punctures her uterus, prevent her from going to a doctor who purports to be able to help but is really quite dangerous, or from buying drugs online. Sending a woman to trial for feticide only drives unsafe abortion further underground. Given Ms. Patel faces the possibility of decades in jail because she failed to call an ambulance after her unassisted premature delivery of an infant that likely could never have been resuscitated by paramedics even if they had been on the scene do you think the next time a woman in Indiana attempts a home abortion (because there will be a next time) that she will be more or less likely to deliver at home, attempt to cover it up, and bleed to death on her floor?

 

 

 

About these ads

Discussion

14 thoughts on “An OB/GYN evaluates the feticide case in Indiana

  1. I’m sorry, but the fact that she took pills to rid herself of the baby implies intent to kill an INNOCENT life. In America it’s easy to get an abortion, so she had plenty of time and opportunity, before the baby was past the 24 week mark. She murdered her child… Intent was there. I also think if you try to kill yourself when your pregnant and it kills the baby instead of you, also murder. We need More protection of the baby, that is a soul that lives!!

    Posted by Lauren | August 29, 2014, 8:46 am
    • There is no evidence Patel took anything- or what she may have taken. Abortions are not easily accessible. many states have one provider (aside from private physicians). In the shuai case the poison she took in the attempted suicide did not affect the baby – the baby died from other complications not related ( one of the meds shuai was given in the hospital was contraindicated for her baby’s gestational age and carried a warning label risking death). I felt different when I read about Shuai, then I found facts. I hope facts come out in this case as well and as a State we can provide healthcare not criminalization

      Posted by Marie Siroky | August 29, 2014, 11:52 am
    • @LAUREN – I live in the UK , but I was under the impression that America was closing abortion clinics down .

      Posted by bojimbo26 | August 29, 2014, 11:35 pm
    • Lauren, it’s very simple. If you don’t want an abortion, don’t have one. Meanwhile please do not try to impose your personal beliefs on other people.

      Posted by Jane Cobb | August 30, 2014, 11:44 am
    • No Lauren it is actually not easy to get an abortion in the US. Because laws with no medical basis are closing clinics in several states. Putting a huge burden on poor women. We are going to see more cases like this one because of these laws that are not about safety and about forcing women to give birth.

      Posted by Michelle | September 4, 2014, 1:28 pm
  2. As always, great writing on an important topic.

    Posted by katekari | August 29, 2014, 9:37 am
  3. Thanks for sharing this, and your opinions on it. I feel like I am just starting to learn and be exposed to all these issues In This profession

    Posted by crankygiraffe | August 29, 2014, 10:06 am
  4. Reblogged this on herlander-walking and commented:
    The war on women continues apace in Indiana. Gee, I miscarried at least three times…..guess I should be grateful I’m not serving life as a serial killer, eh, Indiana?

    Posted by syrbal-labrys | August 29, 2014, 10:58 am
  5. Thank you for this analysis, Dr. Gunter. There are a lot of people caring only about retribution and not considering what may really have happened and how this prosecution will affect public health.

    Posted by S.E.B. MD (@ircrc) | August 29, 2014, 11:03 am
  6. When women can”t get a local abortion, they may feel the might as well do it on their own. They may believe online ads about home abortion. I appreciate your study of this issue. Laws and intimidation tactics have successfully made abortion no longer accessible in most areas. Because of that, I expect we’ll see more do-it-yourself abortion, with all the attendant risks and results. I’m glad you pointed out the kind of assumptions that prosecutors would be making. KC

    Posted by KC Indiana | August 29, 2014, 9:31 pm
  7. Well written Dr. Jen. I hope that you will do a “Part II” follow-up piece as information reveals itself in time.

    One thing that stands out to me is that she had no prenatal care — so there really is no way she would have definitely known she was 28 wks GA. Also, being that she is Indian, I wonder how adapted she is to the US culture. How familiar is she with the 911 emergency system? Are there cultural barriers involved that may play a part in her not contacting EMS? Another concern I have is her education, literacy and intelligence levels wondering if she is able to understand that certain abortion mediations really don’t work past a certain gestational period. Also, what about her mental health status? I definitely think there are a lot of factors to considered.

    I’m truly not sure how accessible abortion is in Indiana. For instance, in the state of Mississippi there is only ONE abortion provider for the whole state … in no terms would I call that accessible.

    Charging and prosecuting this woman will only add unnecessary shaming to a woman who is most likely already psychologically traumatized by this entire event in the first place. I don’t think prison or excessive fines is the way to properly handle this situation. In now way shape or form do I think it’s proper to dehumanize women by punishing them through the criminal justice system if they suffer from any pregnancy psychosis or severe depression; prison time will only make any serious mental health concerns worse never addressing the underlying condition.

    Posted by elizabetcetera | August 29, 2014, 10:05 pm
  8. Are doctors in Indiana obliged to report the death of a very pre-term baby? I can see that here, given that the baby didn’t come to hospital with the mother, getting the police involved quickly made sense, presumably in case the baby was still alive somewhere. But had she turned up on the point of delivery, and the baby died before birth or soon after, would the police have to be involved?

    And another question. Is it possible-for instance by looking at what there is of the cord and placenta-to make a good assessment of gestational age? So in this case, even without the baby there, could the doctors assess the likely age of the baby?

    Posted by Iorek | September 1, 2014, 7:55 pm
  9. Per the Guttmacher Institute “In 2011, there were 12 abortion providers in Indiana…In 2011, 93% of Indiana counties had no abortion clinic. 61% of Indiana women lived in these counties.” (Source: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sfaa/indiana.html)

    Posted by W.P. Fleischmann (@wpfleischmann) | September 5, 2014, 8:03 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: 9 ways personhood amendments are harmful | Dr. Jen Gunter - September 30, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Recent Tweets

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,861 other followers

%d bloggers like this: