you're reading...
abortion, war on women

North Dakota, the irony of aiming for illegal abortions and cheap cigarettes

North Dakota state legislators sent two highly restrictive abortion bills to the governor to sign: banning all abortions at 6 weeks and banning all abortions for genetic anomalies. Rep. Bette Grande introduced the bills, because apparently she looks at legislation “from the life side of things.”

Except smokers. Grande and North Dakota legislators aren’t concerned about the lives of smokers. Not even the lives of young people ages 12-17 who are potential smokers. This lack of concern for cigarette deaths is clear as the Peace Garden state ranks as one of the least expensive places to buy cigarettes in the U.S. (46th out of the 50 states and D.C.) and cigarette price affects consumption. A lot.Screen shot 2013-03-16 at 12.38.39 PM The state tax on cigarettes in North Dakota is a measly $0.44 per pack compared with the national average of $1.48. New York weighs in at a whopping $4.35.

Let’s talk a bit about kids. Because saving lives of children is what theScreen shot 2013-03-16 at 12.32.46 PM Republican lawmakers are all about, right? Smoking kills people and youth smoking prevalence is directly linked to cigarette price. In 2009 when the federal sales tax on cigarettes increased by a measly $0.60, 10% fewer kids reported smoking.

Oh, and let’s not forget premature babies. Smoking bans reduce the incidence of premature births (the #1 cause of infant death). Making cigarettes more expensive could reduce maternal smoking and save innocent babies, even the pre-born, not just troublesome adolescents!

Hey Bette Grande (and all your cronies)…

Want to reduce abortion? Publicly fund long-acting reversible contraception.

Want to save lives? Raise the price of cigarettes.

Want to ignore science and control women? Enact laws about abortion.

Screen shot 2013-03-16 at 1.05.40 PM

About these ads

Discussion

6 thoughts on “North Dakota, the irony of aiming for illegal abortions and cheap cigarettes

  1. As with all politicians , if it gets them votes they will vote for the situation .

    Posted by Jim ( aka@riiibbit ) | March 16, 2013, 1:48 pm
  2. If lawmakers listened to scientists, doctors, and specialists in their fields of choice, many of our laws would be completely upside down. But they’re like that one really annoying friend you have who always thinks s/he is right, about everything, all the time, absolutely without fail. Clearly, that’s not working for the US. Because with logic and reasoning, people actually have to submit to the idea that what they believe may not be what is best for the population they serve.

    Bah. Politics.

    Posted by The Stiletto-Shod One | March 16, 2013, 6:02 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: North Dakota – Charioteering - My Telegraph - March 26, 2013

  2. Pingback: The Legislative Can-Can | The Treating Physician - March 30, 2013

  3. Pingback: Raise cigarette taxes $2 a pack to pay for new lung cancer screening guidelines | Dr. Jen Gunter - January 2, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Recent Tweets

  • Pedometers are practically free, so I say try one of those for a month to see how it goes b4 the Apple watch #hcsm 2 hours ago
  • RT @CatchTheBaby: @DrJenGunter I need to do that. True that you really need to make a commitment to journal (and be honest). 2 hours ago
  • Some people might love the watch, if it motivates them great. But people should think about past health purchases to see if for them #hcsm 2 hours ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,631 other followers

%d bloggers like this: